Polyethylene (PE), High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) and Polypropylene (PP) pipeline coatings are all difficult substrates to coat or paint over due to their low surface energy. They are chemically inert and have a non-polar surface, making it difficult for the coatings to ‘wet out’ or adhere to. The field joint coating must adhere to the prepared steel surface as well as the overlap onto the parent PE or PP coating.
To ensure the adhesion to the PE/PP substrate, surface treatment is required to increase the surface energy and enhance the bond of the liquid LPE coating to the PE/PP mainline coating.
Background
Pipeline coatings have undergone dramatic technological changes over the past two decades. Coatings must now perform at higher in-service operating temperatures, must not be damaged in handling during construction or in operation by soil stress or soil movement, and must provide exceptional corrosion protection. Coatings also must be user friendly and able to be applied in a mill or in the field.
Article continues below…
Those who practice the science of corrosion control know that coatings are the primary means of corrosion protection for a buried pipeline. This applies to new construction or to pipeline rehabilitation. Although cathodic protection is applied to buried or submerged pipelines, it is considered the second line of defence against corrosion. Therefore, today’s coatings must provide better protection than their predecessors, continue to function under severe operating conditions, and be applied under less than ideal conditions. These requirements also apply to the field-applied girth weld coating systems.
Coating selection
Over the last 30 years in North America, the mainline coating of choice for most medium to large diameter pipelines has been fusion bonded epoxy (FBE). For the past 20 years, urethanes and more recently LPE liquids, have become the coating of choice for girth welds, valves and fittings on these pipeline projects. Some of these same North American companies are now considering three layer polyethylene (3LPE) systems as a mainline coating system.
3LPE coatings for pipelines are widely used in Europe, Australia and in the Asian region. Typically, tapes or shrink sleeves have been used to coat the field girth weld. Of late, LPE liquids have been tested and approved for use as a girth weld coating system for the 3LPE/3LPP coated pipelines. Although LPE liquids have superior corrosion protection performance when compared to tapes and shrink sleeves and meet the aforementioned performance requirements of mainline coating systems, bonding to polyethylene has been mistakenly cited as a major concern.
Surface treatment
As a practical field method, the surface of polyethylene can be transformed from non polar to polar by chemical or flame treatment, thereby increasing the LPE liquid coating to polyethylene bond strengths.
In addition to chemical and flame treatment, mechanical abrasion can be used to enhance bonding of liquid coatings to polyethylene.
Flame treatment
Flame treatment of polyethylene has been around for over 50 years. One of the early applications was the flame treatment of polyethylene containers to allow links used for product identification to adhere to the PE surface.
With flame treatment, the combustion action of a hydrocarbon gas releases free radicals during formation of the flame. These free radicals penetrate the polyethylene and modify its surface wettability, which increases the surface energy of the polyethylene. The surface to be treated must be free of contaminants and an oxidising flame must be used to achieve optimum surface energy. Figure 1 shows a type of burner used in flame treatment.
The surface energy of untreated polyethylene ranges from 30-40 dynes/cm. Surface energy of the PE is easily measured using calibrated dyne solutions. A few drops each of a range of dyne solutions are dropped onto the polyethylene surface until one of the solution wets out, meaning that it does not bead.
Chemical treatment
The bond of liquid epoxy to polyethylene can also be improved using primers or a combination of primers and pretreatment wash solutions. Some primers can be applied immediately prior to application of the liquid coating. Others require time to cure prior to application of the top coat.
Mechanical abrasion
Another inexpensive and effective method to enhance bonding to LPE liquid coatings to PE is to abrasive blast the PE. Tests carried out by SPC have shown that sweep blasting of the PE surface is not as effective as an aggressive roughening of the PE surface. Figure 2 shows an abrasive blast cleaned girth weld area with the FBE toe including the PE overlap.
PE coated pipe-end preparation
On a recent project, 3LPE coated pipes were supplied with the exposed FBE toe. The liquid epoxy girth weld coating was required to bond to the steel pipe surface, FBE, and PE. Here the FBE is considered to be the corrosion protection coating, whereas the PE provides mechanical protection. The bond strength of liquid epoxy to blast cleaned steel is greater than 4,000 psi and over 2,000 psi to blast roughened FBE.
Testing bond strength
The major concern when using LPE liquids on polyethylene coatings is the lack of adhesion of the liquids to the PE overlap and failure at the overlap resulting from expansion and contraction of the 3LPE coating.
A series of tests were conducted for each PE surface treatment. Where flame treatment was used, the surface energy of the polyethylene was raised to a minimum of 60 dynes/cm.
To simulate the effect of expansion and contraction on the epoxy to the polyethylene bond, test panels were subjected to a 10 day cyclic test prior to undergoing pull adhesion tests. Each cycle consisted of 12 hours immersion in 3°C water and 12 hours immersion in 65°C water. The cycle ended on the 65°C cycle and the pull off adhesion test was performed within 60 minutes after the hot cycle.
Pull off stubs were affixed to each test plate prior to the start of the test. Table 1 compares the bond strengths of liquid epoxy to polyethylene for various polyethylene pretreatments. An epoxy coated production girth weld is shown in Figure 3.
Quandong LNG Dapeng Pipeline
For BP’s Quandong LNG Dapeng Pipeline, exhaustive testing and certification was conducted with the use of LPE liquids on the 3LPE coated pipes. Adhesion testing on site showed excellent adhesion. In addition, LPE liquids were also used on the HDD joints and the first trial HDD used both shrink sleeves and LPE liquids with the resulting failure of the shrink sleeves – refer to Figures 4, 5A and 5B.
Conclusion
There are those who believe that no coating system can be made to bond to PE, including LPE liquids, and only shrink sleeves or tapes can be used to coat girth welds. Current project experience, testing and approvals by SPCA confirm the superior adhesion of LPE liquids to 3LPE mainline coatings.
LPE liquids do not have the same expansion ratio as PE. However, the 3LPE system consists of a FBE primer, copolymer adhesive and an extruded PE outer layer. This copolymer prevents excessive expansion of the PE.
LPE liquids bond to PE over a wide temperature range. This has been verified by field experience and project history.
LPE Liquid coatings are now being used with three layer polyethylene systems and the concerns with the epoxy to polyethylene bond have been addressed by surface treatment of the PE prior to application of the epoxy corrosion coating.


Basket is empty.







